Was the worst MiG-23 so terrible?

Mihai Vălceleanu

MiG-23MS, the worst MiG-23?

In Hush-Kit’s video (see end of article) on the 10 worst Soviet aircraft, the MiG-23MS was lambasted as a piece of shit. Today, I’m NOT going to complain about how crappy the MiG-23MS was. Instead, I will tell you two things which it did better than the MiG-23M and MiG-23MF.

1. Internal fuel capacity


The MiG-23MS had the largest internal fuel capacity of any MiG-23 fighter variant. Since it didn’t have the heavy and voluminous Sapfir-23D-III radar of the MiG-23M, a part of the avionics bay behind the cockpit could be used for more fuel. The extra space was used to install fuel tank â„– 1a, and tank â„– 1 was larger, same as on the MiG-23BN. This meant that the MiG-23MS had 5400 litres of usable internal fuel (again, same as on the MiG-23BN). Total internal fuel was 5626 litres. For comparison, the MiG-23M and MF had 4700 litres of usable internal fuel (4910-4928 L of total internal fuel). The MiG-23ML had an even smaller internal capacity, since it doesn’t have fuel tank â„– 4 either. Just 4300 L usable internal fuel volume, 4440-4458 L of total volume. The worst was the MiG-23UB, with 4240 L total internal fuel volume.

Note: if you want to calculate weights, standard Soviet fuel density at 15° C considered was 0.830 kg/L for the T-1 kerosene, and 0.785 kg/L for TS-1.

2: Empty aircraft weight


Since the MiG-23MS swapped the MiG-23M’s Sapfir-23D-III (or MiG-23MF’s Sapfir-23E) for the MiG-21’s RP-22SM “Jaybird” radar (just like the MiG-23S). This resulted in a noticeable weight reduction. I’ve never managed to find out how much an empty MiG-23MS weighs, but I can look at the radar weights and take a guess. The MiG-23M/MF radar weighs 564.5/641 kg. The MiG-21BIS radar (RP-22SMA) weighs 196.3 kg.

Now we can’t just subtract the difference between the two, because I don’t know if any ballast weight was necessary. If not, then that would mean at most 368.2/444.7 kg difference between the MS and M/MF. Considering also the lack of TP-23 IRST, my guess about 58 kg (that’s how much the TP-23M, изд. 26Ш1, of the MiG-23ML weighs).

So at most, a 426.2/502.7 kg weight difference, for reference an empty MiG-23M/MF should weigh about 10845-10890 kg. An empty MiG-23ML/MLD-export should weigh 10150 kg to 10230 kg (some give 10310 kg).

But can we find any confirmation for these from former MiG-23 pilots?

But can we find any confirmation from former MiG-23 pilots? The following pilot’s impressions are the only that I’ve found that confirm these features of the MiG-23MS:

Of course, none of this means to insinuate that the MiG-23MS was a good fighter. It had poor weapons (R-3S, R-3R & R-13M at best), structural problems limiting the maximum load factor, crude flight controls, poor roll-yaw stability at high AoA (all of these giving hard-wing Phantom levels of manoeuverability at best), bad visibility out of the cockpit… really, its only redeeming features were high speed & supersonic acceleration.

THE HUSH-KIT BOOK OF WARPLANES VOL 3 IS FIGHTING TO HAPPEN. TO ENSURE IT CAN HAPPEN SUPPORT THIS PROJECT TODAY.

Pre-order our fantastic Book of Warplanes Vol 3 here. Follow us on Twitter X here. Support us on Patreon here.

Follow Mihai Vălceleanu on Twitter here.

Hush Kit's avatar

Looking at culture, news and gossip through an aeroplane window. Featuring contributions by the finest writers and artists. Follow me on Twitter @hush_kit

Leave a Reply